The High Court dismissed the application under Section 482 for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite repeated calls and did not seek an adjournment. The interim order, if any, was vacated.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 17935 of 2019
Applicant :- Mohd. Wakar Ahmad And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pradeep Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Atiqur Rahman Siddiqui,Gaurav Tiwari,Vageesh Pandey
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
List has been revised. None appears on behalf of the applicants in spite of repeated calls. There is no request for adjournment on behalf of the applicants. Shri A.R. Siddiqui, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 as well as the learned AGA are present. The application is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
Office to communicate this order to the Court below within a week.
Order Date :- 17.12.2019 safi
Mohd. Wakar Ahmad And Another
Om Prakash-VII
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
