Hari Singh v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
This application under Section 482 was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite being called in the revised list, vacating any interim order.
This application under Section 482 was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite being called in the revised list, vacating any interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 13402 of 2010
Applicant :- Hari Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Suresh Chandra Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
None for the applicant despite calling case in revised list.
Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
This Application u/s 482 is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 12.12.2019 A. Tripathi
Hari Singh
Raj Beer Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court