This brief judgment records the absence of the applicant's counsel and dismisses the Section 482 Cr.P.C. application for want of prosecution, vacating any interim orders.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 65
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 12822 of 2013
Applicant :- Babloo Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Chaurasia Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Case called out in the revised list. No one is present on behalf of the applicant to press this Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Sri Amit Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Accordingly, the present Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.7.2019 A. Mandhani
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Babloo Pandey
State Of U.P.
Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
