In a writ petition under Article 226, none of the counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls, resulting in the dismissal for want of prosecution on 21.02.2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 9813 of 2018
Petitioner :- Babu Lal Respondent :- Additional District Judge Court No. 12 And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Saxena,Ram Singh Kushwaha
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
None appears to press the present petition despite repeated calls.
The present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 21.2.2019 Jyotsana
Babu Lal
Additional District Judge Court No. 12 And 2 Others
Sunita Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
