Under Article 227, the Court directed the trial court to decide Original Suit No.344 of 2004 expeditiously by fixing short dates and avoiding unnecessary adjournments.
The trial court directed to decide the suit expeditiously by fixing short dates and avoiding unnecessary adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5684 of 2019
Petitioner :- Ram Nayan (Deceased) And 3 Others Respondent :- Civil Judge And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Jaiswal
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
The prayer made in the instant petition is for issuing direction to the trial court to decide Original Suit No.344 of 2004 instituted by Ram Nayan, predecessor-in-interest of petitioners 1/1 and 1/2 and petitioner no.2 Jagdish against the defendantrespondents 2 to 5 expeditiously.
Learned standing counsel Sri Vishal Kakkar is present on behalf of respondent no.1.
Having regard to the fact that the suit is pending since the year 2004, the instant petition is disposed of by directing the trial court to make serious endeavour to decide the suit expeditiously, by fixing short dates and without granting unnecessary adjournments to the parties.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J)
Order Date :- 29.7.2019 SL
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court should be directed to decide a suit pending since 2004 expeditiously.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Nayan And 3 Others
Civil Judge And 4 Others
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
