In this Article 227 petition, the High Court dismissed the matter due to the petitioner's non-appearance and non-prosecution, indicating a loss of interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4830 of 2019 Petitioner :- Mohd. Faraheem Respondent :- The District Judge, Meerut And 13 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Tiwari
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
None appears even in the revised call.
Even on the last date, the counsel for the petitioner was not present and the matter was adjourned in the interest of justice.
It seems that the petitioner has lost interest in the matter.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Order Date :- 22.7.2019 Nitin Verma
(Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.)
Mohd. Faraheem
The District Judge, Meerut
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
