In a writ petition under Article 227, the petitioner asserted compliance with the impugned order dated 06.02.2019. Since this was uncontested, the court held the petition infructuous and disposed of it.
The petition was held infructuous and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3463 of 2019
Petitioner :- Gaurav Gupta Respondent :- Principal Judge Family Court And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag Vajpeyi,Gaurav Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- Vineet Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has already complied with the directions given in the impugned order dated 06.02.2019.
Counsel for the respondent no. 2 does not dispute the same.
Consequently, the petition has been rendered infructuous. It is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 23.7.2019 VR
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Gaurav Gupta
Principal Judge Family Court
Another
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
