A writ petition under Article 227 was heard. The petitioner did not appear to press the petition even after a revised call. The court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3319 of 2018
Petitioner :- Union Of India Represented Through Dy, Chief Engineer N.C.R. Jhansi Respondent :- M/S D.M. Construction, 417/2, C.P. Misson Compound Jhansi Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- Giridhary Lal Choudhary
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition even in revised call. Counsel for respondent is present.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Order Date :- 16.10.2019 skv
Union Of India
M/S D.M. Construction
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
