In a writ petition under Article 227, no one appeared for the petitioner. The petition was dismissed by the High Court for want of prosecution, and any interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2978 of 2015
Petitioner :- Mahipal Singh And 5 Others Respondent :- Som Singh And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- M. Kumar Singh,Atul Dayal Counsel for Respondent :- B.N. Upadhyay,A.D. Saunders,S.C.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the present petition. Sri Santosh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 7.1.2019 Brijesh
Mahipal Singh And 5 Others
Som Singh And Another
Sunita Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
