Petitioner challenged orders under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The Court found no grounds for interference by its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227. Thus, the petition for quashing orders was dismissed.
Prayer for quashing of orders dated 16.03.2019 and 14.08.2018 refused; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2612 of 2019
Petitioner :- Madan Pal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sanjay Singh, learned AGA-I for the State.
Present petition has been filed for quashing the impugned order dated 16.03.2019 passed by learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Court No. 13, Bulandshahar in Criminal revision no. 302 of 2018 (Madan Pal Vs. Ramesh Gaud & others) and impugned order dated 14.08.2018 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Bulandshahar in application under section 156(3) Code of Criminal Procedure at Police Station Jahingarabad, District Bulandshahar.
After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and after perusing the orders impugned as well as material on record, this Court is of the opinion that the learned counsel for the petitioner could not point out any good ground which may call for interference by this Court in exercise of power conferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the orders impugned.
Accordingly, the prayer for quashing the orders impugned is hereby refused.
Present petition lacks merit and is dismissed.
No order as to costs.
Order Date :- 25.4.2019 Arti
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution to quash orders passed in a criminal revision and an application under Section 156(3) CrPC.
Whether any good grounds exist for interference by this Court under Article 227 to quash the impugned orders.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Madan Pal
State Of U.P.
Others
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
