Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition filed under Article 226 with liberty to file a fresh petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn upon submission by counsel indicating an error in nomenclature in the prayer.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2082 of 2019
Petitioner :- Dharampal Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Petitioner :- Manish Joshi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Harsh Kumar,J.
Sri Mukesh Joshi, Advocate holding brief of Sri Manish Joshi, learned counsel for petitioner submits that due to inadvertent mistake State has been sued/made respondent through D.G.C. Civil, Moradabad.
He submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file fresh writ petition.
In view of above submission, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Certified copy of impugned orders be returned to learned counsel for petitioner as per rules of the Court.
Order Date :- 22.4.2019 Kpy
Dharampal Singh
State Of U.P.
Harsh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
