The submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the matter relates to the year 2011. The next submission is that police after holding superficial investigation, submitted the Final Report in the matter and when the same was protested, the petitioner was summoned in exercise of power under Section 190(1)(B) of Cr.P.C. Thereafter, a criminal revision was preferred against the summoning order dated 26.07.2011 bearing Criminal Revision No.284 of 2014 which was rejected by learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, Bijnor and an application came before the High Court by means of Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No.10063 of 2015(Naushad Vs. State of U.P. and others) and coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 30.04.2015 passed a detailed order and declined to interfere in the matter. However, concession was given to the petitioner that if discharge application would be moved within a period of eight weeks, the same shall be decided by the court concerned and till then no coercive action shall be taken against him. The said discharge application was eventually decided against the applicant of which a revision was preferred by the revisionist. It is further contended that revision was admitted but there was no interim order passed in the aforesaid application.
