In a writ petition under Article 226, no one appeared to press the petition in revised call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1579 of 2015
Petitioner :- Bhola Nath And 4 Others Respondent :- Lalmani And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- H.K. Tripathi,R.C. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- N.D. Shukla
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
No one appears to press the petition even in revised call.
Dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 1.11.2019 skv
Bhola Nath And 4 Others
Lalmani And 9 Others
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
