The Single Judge in Writ Tax No. 464 of 2018 allowed the petitioner's writ petition without issuing a separate reasoned judgment, relying entirely on the earlier decision in Writ Tax No. 587 of 2018 involving M/S Godrej and Boyce.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 464 of 2018
Petitioner :- M/S Aditya Birla Fashion And Retail Ltd. Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- Praveen Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Ifaqat Ali Khan,J.
Allowed.
For details see our judgment of date passed in Writ Tax No. 587 of 2018 (M/S Godrej and Boyce manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and two others).
Order Date :- 18.9.2018 Vikram
M/S Aditya Birla Fashion And Retail Ltd.
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Ifaqat Ali Khan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
