Pravindra Kumar Sahravat and Anr. v. State of U.P. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition challenging appointment notification as ADGC Civil dismissed for want of prosecution as no party appeared to press it.
Petition challenging appointment notification as ADGC Civil dismissed for want of prosecution as no party appeared to press it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 63193 of 2009
Petitioner :- Pravindra Kumar Sahravat & Anr. Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vidya Bhushan Srivastava,Sushil Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J. Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
This writ petition has been filed for quashing the notification for appointment as ADGC Civil in the District of Muzaffarnagar. The period for which the appointment was sought has already expired.
No one appears to press this writ petition.
Learned Standing Counsel is present for the State.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 21.5.2018 S.Chaurasia
Pravindra Kumar Sahravat
State Of U.P.
Amreshwar Pratap Sahi
Shashi Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court