This court dismissed the writ petition filed by petitioner Sarita Gupta as not pressed, after her counsel stated that the underlying cheque dispute is resolved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 56970 of 2009
Petitioner :- Sarita Gupta Respondent :- Zonal Manager L.I.C. Of India & Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- R.V. Mishra,B.N. Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- V.K. Chandel
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Shri R.V. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has received cheque no. 960137 dated 1.12.2018 for a sum of Rs.50,000/- from the respondent. He therefore states that the petitioner does not want to press this writ petition and it may be dismissed as not pressed.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Shri V.K. Chandel, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
Order Date :- 3.12.2018 o.k.
Sarita Gupta
Zonal Manager L.I.C. Of India
B. Amit Sthalekar
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
