The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Vinod Kumar Chauhan for want of prosecution as no one appeared on the listed date. Any interim order stood vacated.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 47856 of 2008
Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Chauhan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhitab Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,H.R.Mishra,R. Misra
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
Case called out. No one appears.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 27.10.2018 Vandana
Vinod Kumar Chauhan
State Of U.P.
B. Amit Sthalekar
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
