The Single Judge held the writ petition infructuous as the petitioner lost interest in pursuing the case and dismissed the petition, vacating any interim order.
Writ petition dismissed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42297 of 2008
Petitioner :- Suresh Chandra Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hasan Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
List has been revised. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition even in the revised call.
It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the case. Even otherwise also the writ petition appears to have become infructuous.
It is, accordingly, dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 21.8.2018 Sunil Kr. Gupta
(Rajiv Gupta, J.) (Abhinava Upadhya, J.)
Suresh Chandra Gupta
State Of U.P.
Abhinava Upadhya
Rajiv Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
