The High Court dismissed a writ petition as the petitioners' claim that the application had become infructuous due to the passing of time. Interim orders were vacated.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 41948 of 2007
Petitioner :- Mohd. Yamin & Another Respondent :- The State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- H.P. Dube Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,P.N. Rai
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Shri Abhishek Rai, holding brief of Shri H.P. Dube, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the writ petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time and may be dismissed as such.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 11.12.2018 Amit Mishra
Mohd. Yamin & Another
The State Of U.P. & Others
B. Amit Sthalekar
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
