A 2006 writ petition challenging a labour-related matter before the State of U.P. was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the revised list date.
Dismissed the 2006 writ petition for want of prosecution; vacated interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39658 of 2006
Petitioner :- Kanpur Dehat Eint Nirmata Samiti And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru' Principal Secy. Labour And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Naushad Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
List has been revised. No one appears on behalf of the petitioners.
This is a writ petition of 2006.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
Order Date :- 18.12.2018 nd
Kanpur Dehat Eint Nirmata Samiti And Others
State Of U.P. Thru' Principal Secy. Labour And Others
B. Amit Sthalekar
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
