An interim liberty was granted for the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition. In the meantime, the pending writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37227 of 2018
Petitioner :- M/S S K Associates And Another Respondent :- State Of U P And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Bhan Gupta,Karunesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners Sri Chandra Bhan Gupta submits that due to some error wrong annexures have been filed and there are errors in pleadings also and as such he does not wish to press this petition in its present form. He wants to file a fresh petition bringing on record the correct facts with relevant annexures.
With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 13.11.2018
Pramod
(Ajay Bhanot, J.) (Abhinava Upadhya, J.)
M/S S K Associates
State Of U P
Abhinava Upadhya
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
