High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging grievances against private respondents, noting that civil remedies were available under the law and no interference was warranted at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34631 of 2018
Petitioner :- Ram Sewak Respondent :- State Of U P And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ragvendra Singh Rathour,Uma Shankar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
The petitioner has grievances against the private respondent nos.6 to 10. It is open to him to take recourse to the civil remedies which are available to him under the law. We are not inclined to interfere with the matter at this stage.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 12.11.2018 pks
Ram Sewak
State Of U P
Bharati Sapru
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
