The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as no counsel appeared to press the matter even in the revised call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 31743 of 2018
Petitioner :- Ran Bahadur Yadav Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Yadav,Deepak Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J.
None appears to press the present writ petition even in the revised call.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 14.11.2018 Kamar
Ran Bahadur Yadav
State Of U P
2 Others
Vivek Kumar Birla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
