The court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous after directing the registry to trace a missing milk of some other application for withdrawal filed by the petitioner.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 56
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27023 of 1998
Petitioner :- U.P.S.R.T.C. Lucknow & Another Respondent :- Sri Rama Kant Shukla & Another Counsel for Petitioner :- V.M.Sahai,Samir Sharma,Sunil Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent :- Rakesh Tiwari,Amit Negi,S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
In the present writ petition, the petitioners have filed a Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No.151580 of 2017 seeking withdrawal of the writ petition, as the matter has become infructuous. The application numbered above is not on record.
The Registry is directed to trace out the said application and place it on record. Photocopy of the said application is to be handed over by the counsel for the respondent no.4 during course of the day, same is treated to be an original and place on record.
The writ petition having become infructuous, is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 3.12.2018 Hasnain
U.P.S.R.T.C. Lucknow & Another
Sri Rama Kant Shukla & Another
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
