Held the writ petition infructuous as the impugned suspension order was withdrawn; a separate order cancelling the petitioner's fair price shop license was already passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25570 of 2018
Petitioner :- Neha Devi Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- M.S. Chauhan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ramesh Chandra Upadhyay
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
The petition has become infructuous as the challenge was to the suspension and as the respondent had not taken action within time. Now it is stated at the Bar by Sri S.P.S. Rathure, learned counsel appearing on behalf of State that the order cancelling the fair price shop of the petitioner is already passed.
Hence, this petition itself has become infructuous as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 7.9.2018 Mukesh
Neha Devi
State Of U P
2 Others
Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
