The High Court disposed of the writ petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned authority for redressal, explicitly reserving opinion on the merits of the case.
liberty to approach the authority concerned for redressal of grievances
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23403 of 2018 Petitioner :- Avinash Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satya Narayan Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
This writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents authority to provide security to the petitioner.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the authority concerned for redressal of his grievances, who would look into the matter and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
Order Date :- 13.7.2018
MLK
Avinash Gupta
State Of U.P.
Shashi Kant Gupta
Rajiv Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
