The writ petition challenging illegal dispossession was dismissed as the petitioner should have approached the competent Civil Court for redressal.
Writ petition dismissed; petitioner directed to approach competent Civil Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21394 of 2018
Petitioner :- Nirmal Kumar Panday Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Saran Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
The present petition is directed against private respondent Nos. 4 to 6. The grievance raised by the petitioner are with regard to illegal dispossession of the petitioner by the private persons.
It is open for the petitioner to approach the competent Civil Court for redressal of his grievances.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed .
Order Date :- 15.6.2018 NSC
(Sunita Agarwal, J.)
(Ajit Kumar, J.)
Nirmal Kumar Panday
State Of U.P.
Sunita Agarwal
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
