Writ petitioner's counsel stated the petition was infructuous. Respondent raised no objection. Court dismissed the petition as having become infructuous and vacated any interim orders.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21257 of 2018
Petitioner :- Shiv Prakash Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manoj Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that this petition has become infructuous.
State Counsel has no objection to permit the petition to be withdrawn.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
The interim order, if any, shall stand vacated.
Order Date :- 1.8.2018
Irshad
Shiv Prakash Sharma
State Of U.P.
Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
