The High Court dismissed the writ petition as the Court deemed it inappropriate to entertain the matter due to an underlying dispute between the petitioner and private individuals.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18563 of 2018
Petitioner :- Sushila Pandey Respondent :- The Commissioner Varanasi And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Anand Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Dilip Gupta,J. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
Apparently, there is a dispute between the petitioner and private persons mentioned in paragraph 11 of the writ petition in regard to a property.
In such circumstances, it will not appropriate for the Court to entertain this writ petition. It is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 23.5.2018 Junaid
(Dilip Gupta,J.)
(Neeraj Tiwari,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court can appropriately entertain a writ petition regarding a dispute over property, resulting in dismissal of the petition as inappropriate.
Sushila Pandey
The Commissioner Varanasi
2 Others
Dilip Gupta
Neeraj Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
