The High Court declined to entertain a writ petition due to vague pleadings and joined cause of actions, dismissing it with liberty to file separate petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18398 of 2018
Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Goswami And 9 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brij Gopal,Sachin Puri Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Neeraj Tripathi,Vivek Verma
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
A supplementary affidavit has been filed today, which is taken on record.
The pleadings in the writ petition are absolutely vague. The petitioners have joined several cause of actions leading to more confusion. The Court, therefore, declines to entertain the instant petition and it is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to file separate writ petitions.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J)
Order Date :- 30.5.2018 SL
Pradeep Kumar Goswami And 9 Others
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
