Disposed

Yadu Veer Singh v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC26 Apr 2018WRIC/14873/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged recovery proceedings against agricultural credit dues. Court disposed of petition allowing installment settlement with stay on recovery actions and release of attached properties upon deposit.

What did the court decide?

Recovery proceedings stayed; petitioner directed to deposit amount in 8 quarterly installments starting 15.05.2018; attached properties to be released after first installment.

Yadu Veer Singh Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others — Banking and Recovery | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 33

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14873 of 2018

¶3

Petitioner :- Yadu Veer Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K. Singh Vashisht Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manoj Nigam

¶4

Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J.

¶5

Supplementary-affidavit has been filed today, which is taken on record.

¶6

In the supplementary-affidavit, it has been stated that no auction has taken place till date.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; the learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3; and Sri Manoj Nigam for the respondent nos. 4 and 5.

¶8

The present petition has been filed assailing the recovery certificate dated 01.06.2017 and the auction notice dated 03.02.2018 by which dues, amounting to Rs.3.65 lacs, are being recovered from the petitioner in lieu of the dues payable by the petitioner towards agricultural credit facility availed by the petitioner from the respondent-bank.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he is prepared to deposit the amount in installments, without disputing his liability.

¶10

Counsel for the Bank states that the anxiety of the Bank is that the amount is recovered back.

¶11

Accordingly this petition is disposed of with the following directions:

¶12

(i) Petitioner may deposit the entire amount sought to be recovered directly in concerned Bank in 8 quarterly installments .

¶13

(ii) The first installment shall be deposited by 15.05.2018 and the rest of installments shall be deposited at intervals of three months thereafter . These deposits shall be made with the Branch of the Bank from where the loan was taken.

¶14

(iii) Recovery proceedings during this period will be kept in abeyance. In case petitioner commits default in depositing any of the installments within the above stipulated time, it will be open to the respondents to start the recovery proceedings again by taking coercive process to which the petitioner undertakes not to challenge.

¶15

(iv) Petitioner may file an application for supply of statement of account along with the duly stamped self addressed envelope. In case any such application is filed, the concerned branch of the Bank will give the same to the petitioner after deposit of the first installment within fifteen days and in calculating the arrears, the amount (if any) already paid will be adjusted.

¶16

(v) Property (agricultural land/tractor) belonging to the petitioner, if

¶17

attached, in connection with recovery proceedings, will be released by the concerned Tehsil authority (unless it has already been auctioned) after deposit of first installment. However, unless the property has already been auctioned, no third property right shall be created by the petitioner in either mortgaged or hypothecated property till entire bank dues are cleared.

¶18

(vi) If the installments are deposited as per the schedule fixed in this order, the recovery of collection charges would remain in abeyance till such time the Collector takes a decision and determines the collection charges/fee payable as per the legal provisions and in the light of Full Bench decision of this Court in the case of Maharajwa and others versus State of U.P. and others, reported in 2013(1) ADJ 426 (FB) . Upon determination of collection charges/fee the Collector will communicate the same to the petitioner upon which the petitioner would either deposit the same within a period of 30 days or, if not satisfied, would be at liberty to assail the same in appropriate proceedings.

¶19

Order Date :- 26.4.2018 Sunil Kr Tiwari

Yadu Veer Singh v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yadu Veer Singh v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Premwati Vs Punjab National Bank and 2 Others

M/S Sooraj Automobiles Company Ltd. Vs Vijay Kumar and Another

M/S Sooraj Automobiles Company Ltd. Vs Anmol and Another

M/S Grihapravesh Condominium Association and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Rajeev Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ghanshyam Mishra Vs Civil Judge(Junior Division), Court No. 10, Deoria and 4 Others