Shamshad v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the writ petition due to issues regarding locus and credentials, and the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petitioner withdrew the writ petition due to issues regarding locus and credentials, and the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 27
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14179 of 2018
Petitioner :- Shamshad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Krishna,Govind Krishna Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
The matter was argued at length. The learned counsel for the petitioner was confronted with isssues regarding the locus and credentials of the petitioner. Faced with such issues, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition.
Sri Siddharth Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 18.4.2018 Pramod
Shamshad
State Of U.P.
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court