Ramesh Chandra Gautam v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought direction to respondents to stop interference with land possession during pendency of proceedings. Court, without expressing opinion on merits, directed Sub Divisional Officer Mathura to decide the case expeditiously within six months after hearing.
What did the court decide?
Direction to Sub Divisional Officer, Mathura to decide proceedings after hearing within six months without unnecessary adjournments.