No one appeared to press the writ petition. The court noted non-compliance with a prior order and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 45
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11785 of 2018
Petitioner :- Smt. Simran Arya @ Shaista And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Munesh Kumar Upadhyay,Sheetla Prasad Gound
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
List has been revised. No one appears to press this writ petition. The names of counsel are shown in the cause list.
There is nothing in the record to show that the order dated 30.3.2018 passed by this Court has been complied with. From the records, it is evident that the petitioner no. 2 has not presented fixed deposit receipt of Rs. 1,00,000 in favour of the petitioner no. 1.
The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 30.5.2018 Pratima
Smt. Simran Arya @ Shaista And Another
State Of U.P.
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
