The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a matter before the High Court of Uttar Pradesh. The counsel for the petitioner stated the petition was withdrawn, and the court dismissed the petition accordingly on 9.4.2018.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11638 of 2018
Petitioner :- Rambha Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Pandey,Rajendra Singh,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Dilip Gupta,J. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
Sri Rajendra Singh one of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents and Sri A.P. Paul, learned counsel for the Development Authority have no objection.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 9.4.2018 sartaj
(Dilip Gupta,J.)
(Neeraj Tiwari,J.)
Rambha Pandey
State Of U.P.
Dilip Gupta
Neeraj Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
