The single-judge bench dismissed the petition as withdrawn upon the petitioners' counsel stating that the writ petition is withdrawn at the bar.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11220 of 2018
Petitioner :- Pradumn Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Om Prakash Katiyar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
Sri O.P. Katiyar, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of above statement so made at the bar, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 30.7.2018 piyush
Pradumn Singh
Unknown Second Petitioner
State Of U.P.
Pankaj Mithal
Saral Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
