Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as petitioner was absent and failed to press the matter while standing counsel appeared for the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 56
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 7848 of 1981
Petitioner :- Samar Nath Respondent :- D.D.C. Jaunpur And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- R.N. Shukla,A.N. Mishra,C.P. Srivastava,Namwar Singh,R.K. Malviya,Triveni Shankar Counsel for Respondent :- S.K.Srivastava,B. Dayal,S. Rai,S.C.,V. Dayal
Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
Case taken up in the revised list. Nobody is present on behalf of petitioner to press this writ petition, whereas learned Standing counsel is present on behalf of respondent.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 5.10.2018 Mohit Kushwaha
Samar Nath
D.D.C. Jaunpur
Chandra Dhari Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
