Kripal Singh v. D.D.C.
Case brief
What is this about?
One-judge Bench dismissed a writ petition challenging a reasoned order of the Deputy Director Consolidation finding no case for interference and discharged the interim order.
What the court decided
Court No. - 60
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 6570 of 1981
Petitioner :- Kripal Singh Respondent :- D.D.C. Counsel for Petitioner :- M.M.Chaturvedi,P.N.Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
List is being revised.
Nobody is presented to press the petition on behalf of petitioner.
The writ petition is directed against the order passed by the Deputy Director Consolidation. From the perusal of the order I find that the Deputy Director Consolidation has passed a reasoned and speaking order.
No interference is called for.
Writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 27.7.2018 RCY
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kripal Singh
- respondent
D.D.C.
Coram
Ajit Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIB/6570/1981
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court