Hari Nath v. D.D.C.
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for permission to withdraw the writ petition was allowed. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as having been withdrawn, and any interim orders were vacated.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw writ petition granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 11
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 20259 of 1989
Petitioner :- Hari Nath Respondent :- D.D.C. Counsel for Petitioner :- Triveni Shanker,Ugrasen Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,Anand Shanker
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
(C.M. Application No. 2 of 2018)
This is an application filed on behalf of the petitioner praying for permission to withdraw the present writ petition.
Shri Ugrasen Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner is present.
The application is allowed.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 27.4.2018 Anurag/-
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Hari Nath
- respondent
D.D.C.
Coram
Salil Kumar Rai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIB/20259/1989
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court