Writ petition challenging non-payment of honorarium arrears dismissed. Court held that findings by the Director, who found no evidence produced by petitioners to prove under-deduction, recorded no error and lacked merit for interference.
Writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9868 of 2018 Petitioner :- Shri Prakash Namdev And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ray Sahab Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Ifaqat Ali Khan,J.
Þ;kphx.k }kjk dV NkV dj ekuns; fn;s tkus laca/kh dksbZ lk{; izLrqr ugh fd;k x;k gSA tcfd lacaf/kr ;kphx.k ds izdj.k es izkpk;Z ftyk f'k{kk ,oa izf'k{k.k laLFkku egksck }kjk miyC/k djk;h x;h vk[;k ds vuqlkj ifj"kn dk;kZy; }kjk vkoafVr ctV ls fnukad 25-03-2017 rd vfrfFk izoDrk ds :i es ;kphx.k dh 'kS{kf.kd dk;Zof/k ds lkis{k leLr ekun;s dk Hkqxrku fd;k tk pqdk gSAß (emphasis added)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can interfere with the factual findings recorded by the Director regarding the non-payment of honorarium.
Whether the petitioners produced sufficient material to challenge the Director's finding that no evidence was produced against them.
Shri Prakash Namdev And 2 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Ifaqat Ali Khan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
