The Saket Bench allowed the writ petition by relying on their earlier order dated 10.5.2017 in Writ-A No.- 885 of 2017, without providing independent reasoning.
The writ petition was allowed by reference to the earlier order in Writ-A No.- 885 of 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 63635 of 2015
Petitioner :- Union Of India And 3 Others Respondent :- Sanjay Kumar And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Satish Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent :- Bhagi Rathi Tiwari,Adarsh Bhushan,Arpan Srivastava,S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
The writ petition is allowed.
For order, see our order of date passed on Writ-A No.- 885 of 2017 (Union of India and 3 others Vs. Rajendra Kumar Mishra and another) .
Order Date :- 10.5.2018 S.Sharma
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Union of India and 3 others Vs. Rajendra Kumar Mishra and anotherFollowed¶6
Writ-A No.- 885 of 2017 (Union of India and 3 others Vs. Rajendra Kumar Mishra and another)
Union Of India And 3 Others
Sanjay Kumar And Another
Pankaj Mithal
Saral Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
