Writ petition dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy available under Section 43 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in relation to an arbitral award. No substantive legal proposition derives from this procedural order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6079 of 2018
Petitioner :- Mohd. Nazim Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Janam Shahi Counsel for Respondent :- Sunil Kumar Misra,Sunil Kumar Misra
Hon'ble Ram Surat Ram (Maurya),J.
Sri S.K. Mishra appearing on behalf of UP State Road Transport Corporation states that the petitioners have an alternative remedy for filing objection against the Arbitral Award under Section 43 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
Order Date :- 12.3.2018 Rahul /-
Mohd. Nazim
State Of U.P.
UP State Road Transport Corporation
Ram Surat Ram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
