Satyendra Kumar Jaiswal v. Rohit Kumar Sahu
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed by a single judge for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear even in the revised call.
The writ petition was dismissed by a single judge for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear even in the revised call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 57187 of 2008
Petitioner :- Satyendra Kumar Jaiswal Respondent :- Rohit Kumar Sahu Counsel for Petitioner :- Nishant Mehrotra,Pranjal Mehrotra Counsel for Respondent :- Rakesh Kumar
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
No one appears to press the writ petition even in the revised call.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J)
Order Date :- 29.11.2018 SL
Satyendra Kumar Jaiswal
Rohit Kumar Sahu
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court