Tej Prakash v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged his posting as Regular Junior Clerk against the State of U.P. Denied relief in exercise of writ jurisdiction and dismissed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed; no alteration to the impugned order dated 20.07.2017.
What the court decided
Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5447 of 2018
Petitioner :- Tej Prakash Respondent :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravindra Prakash Srivastava,Ravindra Prakash Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner is working as Adhisankhya Junior Clerk and upon being promoted to the post of Regular Junior Clerk by impugned order dated 20 July 2017, petitioner has been adjusted from Public Health Centre, Bansi (Basantpur), Siddharth Nagar under Chief Medical Officer, the present place of posting to District Woman Hospital, Siddharth Nagar.
Learned Standing Counsel at the outset submits that this is not a transfer, rather administrative adjustment within the district upon promotion of the petitioner.
This fact is not disputed by the learned counsel for petitioner.
Petition is devoid of merit, accordingly, it is dismissed.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether administrative adjustment within the district constitutes illegal transfer warranting quashing.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Tej Prakash
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Suneet Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIA/5447/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court