Petitioner seeks disposal of writ petition based on a previous judgment in Writ A No. 2868 of 2018. The court relies on that prior decision to dispose of the present matter without separate detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5350 of 2018
Petitioner :- Ruma Saxena Respondent :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order rendered on 6.2.2018 in Writ A No.2868 of 2018 ( Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 others ).
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of in terms of the judgment rendered in Writ A No.2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 others).
Order Date :- 9.2.2018 RKP
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 othersRelied on¶4
Writ A No.2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 others)
Ruma Saxena
State Of U.P
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Parties & counsel
