Writ petition was dismissed because the petitioner did not appear to press the case, the court found the petition lacked justification for interference, and the cause of action likely had ceased to survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 42795 of 2003
Petitioner :- Ram Lakhan Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- G.K. Singh,R.L.Singh,V.K. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
" i. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the orders dated 8.9.2003 (Annexure no.1 to this writ petition) passed by District Inspector of Schools and 10.9.2003 (Annexure no.2 to this writ petition) passed by Principal of the institution in question.
ii. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to make payment of salary to the petitioner along with the arrears on that account."
Order Date :- 25.10.2018 KA
Ram Lakhan Singh
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
