A writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear, and notice had been duly served by the court office.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 28347 of 1997
Petitioner :- Pankaj Kumar And Another Respondent :- U.P.S.R.T.C. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Jafar Counsel for Respondent :- Sameer Sharma
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Notice to engage another counsel was issued to the petitioner on 22.2.2018 by the office in pursuance of the order of this Court dated 16.2.2018.
As per office report dated 22.3.2018 neither acknowledgement nor unserved notice has been received. Notice on the petitioner is deemed sufficient. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.3.2018 Atul kr. sri.
Pankaj Kumar
U.P.S.R.T.C.
Siddharth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
