Petitioner contends identity of controversy with Anniruddh Narayan Shukla (2018). Court disposes writ petition based on directions of the cited precedent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 26698 of 2018
Petitioner :- Vivek Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhirendra Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the controversy involved in the present case is identical to the one decided by this Court on 30.10.2018 in the case of Anniruddh Narayan Shukla and 118 others vs. State of U.P. and 3 others.
Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the above factual and legal position.
This writ petition is accordingly disposed of in terms of the observations and directions made in the case of Anniruddh Narayan Shukla (Supra) decided on 30.10.2018.
Order Date :- 17.12.2018 Sumaira
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Anniruddh Narayan Shukla and 118 others vs. State of U.P. and 3 othersFollowed¶5
Anniruddh Narayan Shukla and 118 others vs. State of U.P. and 3 others
Vivek Singh
State Of U.P.
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
