room, lobby on the first floor, as was alleged to be in existence on the ground floor. It is noteworthy that in paragraph 10 of the release application, the landlord has alleged that he and his wife requires one bedroom, one store room, one kitchen, one drawing room for visitors and one guest room for his daughter. Similarly, his son requires one bedroom for himself and his wife, one store room, kitchen, latrine-bathroom and one room for his daughter and drawing room and study room for school going children. Thus, in the release application, the specific case of the landlord was that he required two bedrooms, one for himself and one for use of his guests and daughter, apart from drawing room and other amenities and identical accommodation for his son. The Appellate Court has specifically considered the need of the landlord and has rightly observed that the landlord is best judge of his need. Neither the tenant nor the Court can dictate to the landlord as to how he has to satisfy his requirements. The landlord, it has been observed by the Appellate Court along with his wife needs a complete set for his comfortable living. His son being married along with his wife and daughter also need an independent set for fulfilling their need. Apart from it, drawing room and guest room for accommodating the guest, etc. as per status of the landlord are also required. The Appellate Court, therefore, held that the need of the landlord was genuine and bona fide and it accordingly endorsed the findings recorded by the Prescribed Authority.
