The court granted a one-time indulgence to the petitioner for re-evaluation of her answer-sheet in the Assistant Teacher Recruitment Examination-2018, aligning with directions provided in a related judgment (Writ-A No.18235 of 2018).
Petitioner directed to be considered for re-evaluation in the light of the judgment dated 30th October, 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 24937 of 2018
Petitioner :- Renu Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhirendra Kumar Verma,Shailendra Kumar Verma
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
"It appears that some of the petitioners have not availed of the liberty granted under the Government Order dated 05.10.2018 to apply for reevaluation, for the simple reason that the writ petitions were pending before this Court. It is stated that some of the petitioners were advised not to do so. Since the task of re-evaluation has, otherwise, been made available by the respondents themselves, it would be appropriate to grant one further indulgence to all such petitioners to make their objections or to apply for re-evaluation, within a period of two weeks from today, along with certified and/or true copy of this order. It is made clear that except to grant this opportunity, no further opportunity would be extended to any of the persons to raise a fresh grievance. Exercise of re-evaluation would be carried out by the Examination Regulatory Authority on the basis of observations, made above, and in accordance with law. Aforesaid guidelines are necessary in order to ensure that the candidates are treated fairly and unnecessary further litigation, in respect of the recruitment itself, could be avoided on the questions already formulated.
The Secretary of the Examination Regulatory Authority states that the task of re-evaluation would be completed expeditiously, preferably, within a period of two months from today. It is, however, provided that so long as such exercise is not completed, the left over seats/vacancies of the recruitment in question would not be subjected to a fresh process of
recruitment.
With the observations/directions aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of, accordingly.
No order is passed as to costs."
Order Date :- 27.11.2018 Sanjeev
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner deserves to be included in the re-evaluation process for the Assistant Teacher Recruitment Examination-2018 despite missing the prescribed deadline.
Whether the directions issued in the connected case of Aniruddh Narayan Shukla can be applied to dispose of the present petition.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Aniruddh Narayan Shukla and 118 Others v. State of UP and 3 OthersApplied¶9
Writ-A No.18235 of 2018 in Aniruddh Narayan Shukla and 118 Others v. State of UP and 3 Others
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Renu
State Of U.P.
Secretary of the Examination Regulatory Authority
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
